JRMSU–Tampilisan Campus • AACCUP-ready digital repository
Centralize accreditation evidence. Track completion. Export submission packages.
Built for Agencies → Instruments → Projects → Evidence Requirements, with Task Force submissions and Accreditor verification—plus full activity logs.
DEVELOPMENT OF A DIGITAL REPOSITORY SYSTEM FOR AACCUP ACCREDITATION DOCUMENTS IN JOSE RIZAL MEMORIAL STATE UNIVERSITY TAMPILISAN CAMPUS (JRMSU-TC)
Acredify supports evidence collection, review workflows, and audit-ready reporting.
Project-based accreditation cyclesActivity logs + traceability
A “few pages” system that still covers every accreditation workflow.
Admins define agencies and instruments (templates). Projects represent accreditation cycles. Task Force uploads and submits evidence per requirement. Accreditors verify/reject submissions— and the system recomputes status automatically.
Capabilities
One system for Admin, Task Force, and Accreditor
Agency templates power projects; evidence requirements standardize submissions and reviews.
Overview
Track project readiness across instruments and requirements
See Verified / Under Review / Rejected / Waiting Upload counts
Identify bottlenecks: missing evidence and pending reviews
Project timelines: cycle dates and submission milestones
Audit visibility: recent activity logs (who did what)
Agencies & Instruments
Create Agencies (e.g., AACCUP) and encode Instruments (templates)
Attach instrument documents (PDF/DOCX) for reference
Define instrument requirements with ordering and default required flags
Maintain templates once, reuse across projects/cycles
Projects
Create projects as accreditation cycles (e.g., Level III 2026)
Auto-generate Project Instruments + Evidence Requirements from templates
Set scope by office/program and update status (Draft/Active/Archived)
Assign Task Force members and Accreditors per project
Users & Access
Create/manage accounts and assign roles (Admin / TaskForce / Accreditor)
Activate/deactivate users and manage basic profile info
Control project memberships (who can upload vs review)
Keep accountability through activity log entries
Reports & outputs
Completeness summary per project and instrument
Status view: Verified vs Under Review vs Rejected vs Waiting Upload
Audit trail report from activity logs
Export evidence packages (project-ready submission folders)
Example: requirement status table
Workflow
Simple steps, accreditation-proof outputs
Agency templates + project cycles + evidence requirements—consistent structure from upload to verification.
Define your accreditation body (e.g., AACCUP) then encode Instruments (templates). Instruments become the backbone of evidence requirements.
Why it stays “few pages”
Agencies define templates. Projects instantiate them. Evidence Requirements standardize what to submit—no matter the office, program, or cycle.
Agency → InstrumentsProject → Project InstrumentsRequirements → SubmissionsReview → Verified / Rejected
Auto-generates requirements from templates (no manual checklist encoding every time)
Decisions update completeness and instrument status automatically
Full traceability through activity logs and timestamps
Get started
Launch your accreditation project in minutes
Create a project, auto-generate requirements from templates, assign members, and start collecting evidence with full traceability.
ProjectsAACCUP-ready
Sign in to continue
For Admin, Task Force, and Accreditor accounts.
Sign in Review features
What you get
Templates (instruments), evidence requirements, review decisions, and activity logs.
Request accessJRMSU–TC
Request an account
Send your details to the Admin for onboarding and role assignment.